The story: Bordeaux can be an intimidating land of extreme price ranges and confusing French words to those who don't spend some time to familiarize themselves with the complicated region. There are so many designations, 57 appellations, and over 10,000 producers. Mix into this the fact that most wine-producing Chateux were classified by their quality in 1855 with many changes occurring in growing and vinification techniques since then, and it can simply be overwhelming.
But it does not have to be, and in fact the sheer volume of production coming out of Bordeaux is enough to leave a wine lover the ability to explore for a lifetime. As we sit here today the wine world is focused on an annual event in Bordeaux called
En Primeur. This event brings the worlds biggest buyers and critics to Bordeaux to taste through the most recent vintage (still in barrel) and make grand pronouncements about the quality of the vintage, which in turn creates hype, and allows the Bordelais to set future prices. Wines from the 2010 vintage will generally be shipped to the U.S. around 2013 (we're talking red and sweet wines of a particular quality, you can always get 2010's begining later this year for both white and simpler reds).
My advice on Bordeaux is to just dive in. Learn a bit about the major appellations and major houses that are producing wine. Then move on to search for producers that have developed a reputation for nice quality wine with consistency from vintage to vintage and a value driven price. I have listed two wines here that have developed a reputation for offering a taste of Bordeaux at a relatively affordable price.
The wine: The Chateau de Lamothe de Haux 2009 is a white Bordeaux made up of 40% sauvignon blanc, 40% semillon, and 20% muscadelle. It is a brilliant bright yellow with a nose of juicy apple, pear, and citrus. There is a beautiful chalk dust like component to the nose as well. It is a bright and acidic wine but surprisingly juicy in the mouth making it refreshing, food friendly, and interesting. The flavors are mostly reminiscent of golden apple with a decent punch of minerality on the crisp finish.
The
2003 Chateau de Reignac is 75% merlot and 25% cabernet sauvignon and while it lies outside of any recognized quality appellation, the house has been praised many years for producing wines of quality. The wine was a very dark black at its core, and fading to intense purple. The nose was bursting with plum and milk chocolate, although it suffered from a bit of alcoholic heat that did not blow off over time. All of these aromas were carried over an earthy, fresh dirt element that flirted underneath. On the palette the wine came across as medium bodied, full of dark fruit, and sporting tannins that had softened to a beautiful texture. It was beginning to show its age with integrated spicy oak that added to an overall creaminess, and roasted coffee, tobacco, licorice, menthol, and tar showing through.
The verdict: The white Bordeaux is available for
under $15 and is really a lovely wine. I suggest it is a refreshing drink on a hot day, or with light appetizers and seafood. It is such a great balance between fruit and austerity that it is a perfect example of what classic French winemaking can offer.
The Reignac is from an older vintage, but the house has turned out very good wines for the money year after year, and almost always for
under $20. At that price it is really a spectacular way to expose your palette to the joys of Old World merlot and cabernet sauvignon. This wine clearly deliniates the difference in its restrained fruit flavors, but imminently enjoyable and complex tertiary flavors.
In both cases I strongly encourage you to explore Bordeaux and what it has to offer.