The story: I'm skeptical about Lodi. With
normal high temperatures in July and August reaching the upper 90's, no apparent coastal influence, and a reputation as just another town in California's lackluster Central Valley, I'm concerned. Just so I'm clear I do not think the Central Valley as a whole is lackluster (who doesn't love Kettleman City?), but as a grape growing region it primarily fuels the jug wines that used to be hidden in my Evangelical college dorm room's closet. At the same time I'm fascinated by Lodi and seeking out information to prove my skepticism wrong. I know there are some good zinfandels coming out of the region, but as they begin to market themselves as an emerging wine region can they succeed? At what point does marketing end and established reputation take over? I have inquired about Lodi's emergence out of the 'jug wine' reputation and into the distinctive and reputable AVA status with both the Lodi Woodbridge Winegrape Commission, and a couple of smaller boutique wineries directly. I have not heard anything back. Now I clearly recognize that me, and this blog, are of no importance to the people who are working very hard in Lodi and believe in what they are doing. But I would love to get a little insight into what they are doing and share that information here, if anyone up there is interested. I am absolutely open to the idea that Lodi is on the rise, doing some interesting and innovative things, and has some validity as an equal part of California's vast quality wine producing reputation. I just want to see and experience this before I will completely buy it. Unfortunately the example of Lodi wine that I found locally (I purposely did not get a zinfandel) only furthered my concerns.
The wine: 337 Lodi Cabernet Sauvignon 2007, pours a dark black opaque with just hints of purple hues. It has an inky nose full of very ripe blackberry jam and just a hint of smoked meats. The first thing I taste is a fake oaky vanilla, almost like vanilla extract, and then just tons of blackberries and blueberries. In combination the wine almost tastes like an inexpensive blueberry ice cream. The finish is medium in length, with a touch of spice but has no substantial tannin structure and comes off as incredibly flabby. Overall it is way overdone, and feels a little bit fake.
The verdict: I hated this wine, it almost made me mad. It made me mad because I know that this wine is available in large production and it does Lodi no favors. It perpetuates the reputation of the fruit being too hot, too large of yields, and just flabby, fruity, and simple. It is widely available in grocery stores (and
elsewhere) for about $11-$13. I give it a 2 out of 5. That said, there are people who will like this wine simply because it tastes like artificial blueberry ice cream, so it may have its place as your party's 5th bottle of wine with friends who don't care much about wine.
Now that this is behind us, folks in Lodi I want to believe, I want to be converted. Point me in the right direction and I will gladly seek it out and report back. If Lodi comes down as a place only for zinfandel and stale John Fogerty references I am also okay with that, but I'm rooting for a rise of the underdog type of story so help me believe.
7 comments: